Member Node Wranglers (Fridays at 10:00 am AK/11:00 AM PDT/12:00 MDT/1:00pm CDT/2:00pm EDT) 

https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/430697153

30 August 2013

Attendees: Rebecca, Dave

Regrets:  Bruce, Laura, Amber

Agenda: 
        1. High profile issues
        Documentation - Rob has developed a high-level flowchart-y thing intended for the public website:  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YVEyFrqZPclr_tzhLtzYdW8tdu-fVeVQ-8yeHYhH9xc/edit
        It is the same information as what we are updating in mule and would probably link to mule for the detailed information.  It's beautiful.
        See the current flowchart: http://mule1.dataone.org/OperationDocs/member_node_deployment/mn_checklist.html and down at the bottom there is a link to the working copy
        
        Dave will meet with Chris, Rob and Laura next week to make sure all the pieces are in place for the documentation - he agrees that it's looking good!
        
        Bruce: email out to Dave, Matt, Chris re: OpenDAP
        As Dave mentioned in LT call, he has developer with OpenDAP experience will be able to evaluate how much effort would be required to develop an OpenDAP MN software stack
        
      This is as far as Dave and I went on the agenda - can be resumed from here next week  
        2. Status of MNs 
        3. Old action items
            Laura to check into AKN/eBird tickets (3560 and 3209).  in progress 8/26 - regarding URN, Steve Kelling says CLOAKN is NOT the right name to associate with the current MN (eBird).  Previously, we had said (at least amongst ourselves) that it would be really nasty to try to change the URN on a MN.  We probably ought to have a separate meeting, maybe with the eBird and AKN folks or maybe just us and then with them, to try to sort this out.
        
        4. Not-high profile issues
        
                Rebecca:  at NSF meeting, Reagan said that he expects DFC interoperability within 6 months, asked for someone in DataONE as POC (that would be Dave)
                Bruce: OpenDAP
     
         Rebecca: what is the status of the issue where some MNs think they have  more products than what DataONE shows?  Is it resolved?  (USGS and ORNL  DAAC have had this issue where they think they have more data products  than we see in DataONE.)
        John: there are redmine tickets which track this issue
            ... looking at tickets....
        Seeing a lot of tickets which show "new" are probably resolved but ticket hasn't been updated.
         ACTION: follow up on tickets that may not be necessarily assigned to us  - BIG job - let's talk about this again when Dave's with us.
        
        5. Around the room